Long Term Care Insurance circa 2007

When long term care insurance was firsthave used unethical, but not previously illegal
conceived and offered, back in the 1980's, mosttactics.
LTCi premium rates were much lower thanCompanies sold low-priced policies to unhealthy
today's policies. Why have they increased sopeople, then sold their LTCi business claiming
much and why are long term care insurancefinancial duress due to too many claims. The
companies raising premiums on existing policies?original, "low-balling" company makes money while
Well, for one thing, many long term carethe new owner of the LTCi business is left to
insurance polices today offer significantly moreclean up the mess, and the policy holders face the
benefits than the old "nursing home only" policies.unenviable choice of paying increasing rates or
Due to consumer demand as well as consumergiving up their coverage.
protection laws being passed, long term careWhy do I say that companies, who didn't even
insurance policies of today have less restrictionshave proper actuarial data, could be considered
(As with any contract, always read the fine print!).unethical for selling low-balled policies to unhealthy
The more an insurance company has to pay out,people? Well, because I've spoken with truly
the higher the premiums with be.ethical, independent long term care insurance
Other reasons, besides the all too prevalentbrokers who wouldn't sell those companies'
inflation, are that long term care insuranceproducts unless there was no other way to insure
companies had no previous actuarial data toa person. Even then, they'd make sure to let their
crunch. For instance: How long would a person payclient know that their rates would most likely
before going on claim? How many would dieincrease in the future. These brokers could see
before collecting benefits? How much moneywhat the future held, so why didn't the companies
would the long term care insurance companyconsider the future?
need to pay out in claims? And finally, would theThe problem is that it is difficult, if not impossible,
company's product sales and investments provideto prove that an insurance company was aware
enough assets to keep them viable?of these concerns ahead of time.
Insurance companies didn't have past experienceLuckily for the consumer, there have been
with long term care claims, plus competition waspositive changes. Laws are being passed due to
stiff. As years ticked by, many companiesthe frequent and high rate increases. Do your
offered more benefits while keeping theirhomework. Find out exactly what your state's
premiums quite low. Some even sold low-pricedlaws are pertaining to the sale of LTCi and the
policies to people with health conditions that wouldobligations of LTCi companies to their
likely lead to long term care. This was a bigpolicyholders.
mistake.In Arizona, companies must offer their policy
My mother bought a low-balled policy that washolders choices when premiums are raised. They
packed with benefits. She paid about $1500 acan lower the amount of their original coverage in
year for 5 years. After 3 year's worth of recentorder to keep their premiums the same or they
rate increases, her premium has more thancan stop paying their premiums altogether. With
doubled. As strokes and Alzheimers run in ourthe latter choice, the company creates a fund for
family, we're hoping that the insurance companythe policy holder in the amount of the total
doesn't increase her premium many more times.premium payments paid to the company. That
Are we upset that Mom's premium has increasedfund will pay for the policy holder's long term care
so much? Yes and no. No one likes unexpected,until the money runs out. Of course, it does not
unpleasant changes and certainly no one wants totake inflation into consideration.
pay more for insurance, but we do appreciateMy mother was given those 2 options this year
that she has been protected against catastrophicwhen she received notice of (yet another)
long term care costs all these years, whether shepremium rate increase. Since she had only paid
used the insurance or not.about $10,500 in premiums, which that would only
Now some folks would call significant ratecover a little over 3 months worth of long term
increases on an unsuspecting consumer fraud. Butcare in a skilled nursing facility, she opted to keep
it's not. It IS quite unfortunate, but it's not fraud.her existing policy/premium. She was lucky. She
If it were, the Department of Insurance in everywas able to afford the higher premium even
state would shut the long term care insurancethough she is on a fixed income.
companies down.BTW, a few LTCi companies have not raised their
Most LTCi companies simply did not have therates. They offer very good, expensive policies,
foresight to charge enough money for their earliertherefore reducing the possibility of future rate
policies. They guessed at how much moneyincreases. Even with laws in place; inflation, a
they'd need to charge and they guessed wrong.drastic increase in claims and how well a
They're still trying to figure out how much theycompany's investments fare can contribute
need to charge in order to maintain a healthy poolgreatly to whether an LTCi company asks for
of money from which to pay claims, while stillrate increases or even remains viable.
remaining competitive. The playing field keepsCheck your State's Department of Insurance to
changing. Not the least of their problems is thefind out which companies have raised rates and
rate of inflation in the long term care sector. LTCialso to see if any complaints have been made
companies have to pay out more money foragainst a particular insurance company or agent.
equivalent care every year.Check with the services like Weiss Research,
That's the insurance companies' point of view. ButStandard & Poor's, Moody's, AM Best and Duff &
there are two sides to any story.Phelps to research the financial status of any long
It does appear that some LTCi companies mayterm care insurance company.