Addressing Fraud Risk Management in the Energy Industry

Fraud remains a serious risk for companies in thefunds.  Companies should take prevention steps
energy industry.  This publication, which is derivedto help ensure that conflicts of interests do no
from the June 18, 2009 Webcast “Fraud Riskinterfere with the normal procurement process.
Management,” will highlight the national andOil and Gas Reserve Valuations
industry results from KPMG Forensic’sCompanies should consider reserve valuations an
Integrity Survey 2008-2009 and address fraudongoing risk.  Oil and gas reserve valuations are
and misconduct in the energy sector.estimates derived from reserve engineering
KPMG Integrity Survey 2008-2009: Backgroundreports, but they are often difficult to estimate
and Methodologygiven the fact that the reserves are not easily
The KPMG Integrity Survey was initiallymeasured.  Despite the presence of strong
undertaken to help clients measure risks,expertise, valuing reserves still proves to be
strengths, and weaknesses associated with theirsubjective and open to potential misstatement. 
ethics and compliance programs.  TheseIn addition, industry analysts often place higher
challenges include the kind of ethics andvalues on reserves, increasing the pressure to
compliance risks that they perceived occurring inmisstate reserves in a down economy.  The SEC
their organization, how well they view their ethicshas looked at oil and gas reserve valuations given
and compliance programs working in terms ofthat they are significant estimates for some
actually having an influence on the behaviors andcompanies, and effective prevention steps should
decisions of employees, and where they seebe taken to help ensure reserves are valued
some of the root causes of any shortcomings. appropriately.
The survey is not only a way to understand whatRevenue Recognition
is happening nationally and across differentRevenue growth is important to increasing
industries, but it is also a tool that organizationsshareholder value, but a difficult economy could
can use to compare their results against theseincrease the pressure to recognize revenue
external benchmarks.improperly.  Special attention should be
The key findings in the survey are that theconsidered in the areas of meter reading and
prevalence of fraud and misconduct withinunbilled revenue calculations for the utilities
organizations remains high and the nature of thesector.  Improperly recorded gains can also come
misconduct remains serious.  Pressures,from the sham sales, when companies sell assets
incentives, inadequate resources, and jobwith the intent to repurchase them.  A strong
uncertainty are major drivers of misconduct. corporate governance strategy can help ensure
Whistleblower mechanisms are gaining traction,revenue recognition issues are minimized.
but risks of silence remain.  Finally, ethics andMisappropriation of Costs between Regulated and
compliance programs continue to have aNonregulated Businesses
favorable impact on employee perceptions andMisappropriating costs of a nonregulated business
behaviors.  The report on the results of thewith a regulated business can be used to increase
KPMG Integrity Survey as well as the Integritythe regulated affiliate’s revenue, as the
Survey – Energy and Natural Resourcesregulated affiliate can pass costs through to
Results are available on the Global Energy Institutecustomers.  This could involve action from state
Website atand federal regulators.  It is critical to financial
Specific Risks to the Energy Industryreporting that companies appropriately classify
Energy companies face specific risks, as thethese costs.
perceived changes in the current economicValuation of Derivative Instruments
environment have heightened the focus on theThere is a heightened focus on the valuation of
regulatory environment.  This includes anderivative instruments.  Energy and commodity
increased focus on market manipulation, violationsderivative contracts must be recorded at fair
of the Foreign Corrupt Practices Act (FCPA),value.  This creates a level of subjectivity in the
conflicts of interest, oil, and gas reservevaluation of these contracts, which can increase
valuations, revenue recognition, misappropriation ofthe company’s risk of inappropriately
costs between regulated and nonregulatedoverstating gains and understating losses.
businesses, valuation of derivative instruments,Derivative contracts for energy or commodity
environmental compliance regulations, and royaltycontracts could be deliberately manipulated within
payments.the financial statements.  Prevention programs
Market Manipulationcan assist the company in effectively valuing
Market manipulation is an intentional act tothese instruments.  The SEC and the CFTC are
manipulate commodity prices through the forceslooking at changing the regulations to require a
of supply and demand.  This may include washderivative contract to be traded via an
trades, manipulation of prices between affiliates,exchange.  Customized instruments unsuited to
false index reporting, transactions predicated onsuch treatment would be subjected to more
false information, collusion for the purpose ofrecord-keeping under the proposed changes.
manipulating the market, withholding generatingEnvironmental Compliance Regulations
capacity, and cornering the market.Complying with the environmental regulations is
Market manipulation has always been the purviewbecoming a routine aspect of the regulatory
of the Federal Energy Regulatory Commissionprofile energy companies.  Environmental
(FERC) and the Commodity Futures Tradingregulations are extremely costly, even for
Commission (CFTC).  The Securities andregulated entities with cost recovery, and there
Exchange Commission (SEC) and the Federalmay be pressure in a down economy to allow
Trade Commission (FTC) are additional governingsome noncompliance with these regulations. 
bodies with recent authority over marketFalse reporting of environmental compliance may
manipulation.also be a consideration when requirements have
Over the past few years, there has been ano be fully satisfied.  Environmental liabilities can
heightened awareness of market manipulation andinvolve subjective estimates open to manipulation,
there have been more fines and enforcementand companies need to ensure that the reporting
actions.  Companies in the energy industry shouldis accurate.  They need to look at their
be aware of the penalties associated with thisestimates and the changes and ensure that their
misconduct, they should ensure that they have amethodology is documented.  Companies also
compliance program in place, and they should alsoneed to ensure that there is some clear direction
ensure that they have a process in place to testor communication of why any changes have been
that program.  Companies should be able tomade.  Prevention programs can assist the
show a regulatory body that they are monitoringcompany in managing these regulations
the program.effectively.
Violation of the FCPARoyalty Payments
Energy companies with international businessThere is an increase in the number of claims
activities should be aware of potential bribery andrelated to royalty disputes, as royalty calculations
corruption actions that could violate the FCPA. can sometimes be vague and misinterpreted. 
Companies should ensure that they have aManagement may calculate royalty payments in
compliance program as well as processes in placean inappropriate manner as commodity prices
to test those programs.  Companies should alsofluctuate.  Companies should have prevention
consider potential mitigation activities that couldprograms in place to assist the company in the
lead to a reduction in the occurrence of thesemanaging these obligations effectively.
violations, and they should strengthen reactionConclusion
mechanisms for detected violations.Fraud remains a serious risk for companies in the
Conflicts of Interestenergy industry, and there is a heightened focus
New Contracts and new vendors may openon the regulatory environment.  Surveys allow
energy companies to new conflicts of interestscompanies to gather diverse viewpoints and
between company decision makers and potentialcompare results internally and over time, and they
new vendors.  An example of a potential conflictare also an early warning mechanism and
of interest may be a kickback or payment madeidentification of areas of concern. Companies can
to an insider with the intent to coerce a decisionuse the KPMG Integrity Survey as a tool to
regarding a specific vendor and/or contract. compare their internal survey results against
Conflicts of interest may pose new risks, inthese external benchmarks.
particular with the stimulus package and federal