Examining the Convergence of GAAP With International Standards

Historically, for centuries Western economies havecountries to follow their own accounting
operated by a select few in power and wealthstandards, there has been a push by the SEC for
making political and business decisions in secretthe US to move from the current GAAP to the
that affect the masses; even if those millions aremore widely used IFRS accounting method. Most
unaware of these deals. As the world's economiesnotably, The U.S. is one of the only countries still
globalize and modernize, with informationusing GAAP, and according to the SEC is
becoming instantaneous, the common notionprojecting that we will make the transition around
becomes one of knowing what leaders in politics2015 or 2016. There are some fundamental
and business are doing to affect the world'sdifferences in the two methods. One of the
economies. The truth is that a surprisingmajor differences is that GAAP is rules based
percentage of business and diplomacywhere IFRS is principle based. Rules based means
internationally is still held in the "traditional" way ofthat accountants focus mostly on the literature
political and business leaders making deals behindaspect of accounting. GAAP attempts to project
closed doors that affect people worldwide.every possible situation that may occur and have
In order to maintain a free and honest ECONOMY,a written rule on how to deal with that situation.
the development and enforcement of accountingPrinciple based leaves room for different analysis
principles and regulations internationally isand interpretations on similar situations.
imperative. Traditionally, American GenerallyBoth the rules-based method and principle-based
Accepted Accounting Principles (GAAP) have heldmethods have their downfalls. In following the
stringent regulations on businesses' reporting andrules-based method, there is rigorous training
disclosure of their financial transactions(2);needed in order to be knowledgeable about any
translating to large penalties and litigation for anysituation that may occur. On the other hand,
company who violates these principles.principle-based tends to leave uncertainty and
Internationally, accounting principles have been arequires extensive disclosures in the financial
mix of guidelines and recommendations (IFRS) onstatements. There are also some differences in
bookkeeping that are not necessarily enforceablethe way financial reports are written under the
by law(2). These more relaxed guidelines havetwo methods. On the Income statement, under
allowed for some international corruption to enterGAAP, any extraordinary items are shown below
into business practices. This has leaded the globalthe net income. Under the IFRS any extraordinary
accounting community to instate a universalitems are not separated, according to the
standard for all businesses independent of countryAnother difference between the two is that
of origin.under GAAP accountants have a choice of using
The corruption of government and businessthe LIFO or FIFO method to account for
officials is "how business in Europe is done" (1). Ainventory where under IFRS accounts must use
landmark case of which spurred changes in IFRSFIFO. This is a big change that will undoubtedly
was one with a British company whom madebring have some positive and negative effects.
corrupt business deals with Saudi Arabian royalty.The SEC would not be pushing this matter if it did
In the mid 1980's, Saudi princes brokered an armsnot benefit the U.S. According to the
deal with the United States, Britain and Saudijournalofaccountancy.com, the adoption of the
Arabia and the arms manufacturer BritishIFRS by other countries has resulted in strong
Aerospace (BAE). Essentially the terms of theeconomic benefits. These benefits include increase
deal left BAE with government weaponsin company stock value, increase in market
contracts in the three countries involved in theliquidity, and lower cost of capital. There are also
deal, while the company paid almost thecost savings because under IFRS companies will
equivalent of 1.5 billion dollars in cash, vacations,no longer have to report under several sets of
cars and shopping sprees to the family andstandards. Other benefits include enhanced financial
friends of the Saudi princes who brokered thetransparency for investors, and enhanced overall
exchange. The money for this company spendingfinancial reporting. Arguably the most important
came from a "slush fund"(1); money kept off offactor in switching to IFRS is that it improves
financial records so that most people examiningcommunications and relations with other countries.
them could not detect the fraud. For overSince most countries operate under the IFRS, it
thirteen years this fund paid out to these princeswould make it easier if the U.S. operated the
as BAE received renewed government contracts.same standards.
Whistleblowers were kept silent for years, untilAs the global business community moves towards
media outlets discovered the fraud and the Britishan international accounting standard and issues
government was forced to take action. Otherdealing with fraud and business conduct, other
notable cases include companies such as Siemensproblems arise with enforcement and its
information systems and Halliburton Oil Company,sustainability. According to Wiecek and Young,
which had similar issues with the use of "slushthere is a concern that private companies-
funds" to get large contracts. Those companiesspecifically small and mid-sized ones- would not
were charged and faced large penalties in thebenefit from using IFRS. Their operations run in a
United States.local market and often occur on smaller, simplified
Since scandals like BAE have come to internationalbusiness models that make IFRS accounting
attention in recent years, the need for greaterstandards too complex and costly to implement.
business regulation beyond borders has come toAnother concern with the emerging international
the most attention it has ever had. Thestandard is implementation in smaller, less
international community has been examining usedeveloped countries. In these cases, lack of
of accounting standards to combat businessgovernmental support and stability along with
practices once held by BAE, Halliburton andissues with lack of access to technology makes it
Siemens as opposed to attempting to makenearly impossible for small or mid-sized in
countries enact laws or forming regulatorydeveloping nations to implement IFRS standards.
agencies.In some of these companies, fraudulent business
The International Accounting Standardspractices are a usual occurrence.
Committee is an international board of accountingHow will these issues change the case like BAE?
specialists who are working towards anFor one the billions of dollars kept in the "slush
international standard for accounting. Having suchfund" for the company must be correctly named
standards in place would allow a capital andand disclosed in financial statements. Companies
business exchanges to occur more freely and helpwould no longer be able to hide money or use it
prevent fraud and corruption from happening. Thefor unsavory business practices. This would force
discrepancies in international and North Americanthe international business community to make all
accounting standards add challenges to conductingof their financial records public. In doing so, fraud
business internationally. As mentioned before, itcan be avoided, along with the use of company
also allows for fraud and corruption to enter intofunds for uses other than it was intended. Uniting
the business arena.financial standards will allow for greater expansion
Because the United States is one of the lastof foreign trade and better business practices.