Fraud Increases During Tough Times

 stole had a stronger expressed belief in the
According to the Association of Certified Fraudwrongness of theft!
Examiners, frauds due to financial pressure duringOver a period of 21 years, my investigative staff
the recent economic downturn have increased. & I completed more than 12,500
While this claim is not surprising, it may also notapprehensions of employees, suppliers and
be accurate.  Certainly, frauds and thefts havecustomers relating to theft and fraud.  The most
increased in the past two years.  But they havecommon items stolen were not hamburger, warm
also increased almost rhythmically over the pastclothing, baby food, pharmaceuticals or the
20 years.essential items.  The most common items
There is an underlying inference that fraud andshoplifted or stolen by employees were
theft are caused by hardships.  This is completelycigarettes, beauty items, high-end meats and
untrue.fancy household & personal accessories. 
When I entered the investigative field in 1979, IThese goods represent thefts of greed, not of
operated on the assumption that seniors did notneed.
steal unless they were in great need, that mostAs an illustration of the power of opportunity, I
thefts were caused by low-income people, androutinely placed three five-dollar bills at strategic
that workplace fraud & theft was anlocations during my public seminars on theft and
uncommon occurrence.fraud.  One bill was placed at the podium where I
What I discovered was that the wealthy were asstood.  The second was placed at the back of
likely to shoplift as the poor, that the items thatthe room, on the snack & coffee table. 
were stolen seldom represented "needed"The third was placed on the floor outside the
merchandise, and that workplace theft was moreseminar room door.   In every seminar but one,
common than external theft.the $5 outside the seminar meeting room was
Theft and fraud are nothing but crimes oftaken, and not turned in to the seminar leaders,
opportunity. even though this event was often the only one in
In  1990, I arrested a female cashier at athe building.  In more than 70% of the
pharmacy that admitted to stealing more thanpresentations, the $5 on the coffee table
$35,000 from her employer over a period of 13disappeared.  The $5 on the podium never was
months.  What enabled her to do so?  Hertaken.  This provided a clear illustration of the
employer was also taking cash from the cashpower of opportunity, not the power of need, as
register, to feed his gambling habit. every attendee was a business manager or
Consequently, there was no accountability, and, inowner.  But why did the $5 at the door not get
tandem with the lack of controls, there was anstolen on one occasion?  In that community,
abundance of opportunity.  Why did she steal,there was a strong moral ethic governed by the
however?  More than $25,000 of the moneypredominantly Mennonite residents.  Everyone
was sent overseas to her family in Saudi Arabia,knew everyone else.  So, there was no
who were moderately affluent.opportunity?  But that begs the question, Why
In 1992, my company took part in a study ondid no one turn in the bill?  Perhaps each was
theft prone personalities, conducted bywaiting for an actual opportunity to take the
psychologists Frank McShane and Barry Noonan. money!
This study found that there was no statisticalEconomic stress is only one factor in theft &
difference in income or education levels of thosefraud behaviour.  So, clearly, there is more at
that stole versus those that did not.  However,play in the fraud increases during the economic
there was one area where there was a markeddownturn than just the tough times alone!
difference between the two groups: those that