Report Reveals Foreclosure Settlement Conference Program a Failure in New York City

Numerous states and cities have passed lawstrue.
requiring mediation between mortgage companiesWhy have Settlement Conferences Failed?
and people facing foreclosure. The purpose of thisThey found that mortgage companies were not
mediation is for the people facing foreclosure andcomplying with the law.
their mortgage company to meet with anThe law is explicit. It says that mortgage
arbitrator. At this meeting they try to modify thecompanies are to send attorneys to these
existing loan and reduce the payment to a levelsettlement conferences. These attorneys are to
that people can afford to make on a monthlybring the proper documentation on the case with
basis. By doing that people can save their homesthem. They are also to have the power to
and foreclosure can be avoided.negotiate a settlement for the mortgage
In some instances this mediation is mandatorycompany.
and in other instances it is voluntary.Actually the lawyers sent by the mortgage
The first of these laws were passed in 2008. Socompanies had little knowledge of most cases.
far there have been very few reports on howThey frequently did not have the facts and didn't
effective these laws have been on accomplishinghave the history of what had transpired. They
what they were designed to do.also did not have the power to make a deal on
New York's Mandatory Foreclosure Settlementbehalf of the mortgage company.
Conference ProgramIf the mortgage company made a previous offer
New York was one of the first states to pass ato modify a loan, the lawyers only had a copy of
law in August of 2008. The law created ait 3% of the time. More concerning was the fact
mandatory Foreclosure Settlement Conferencethat lawyers were aware of previous offers
Program for people with subprime mortgagesmade by the mortgage companies only 6% of
who were facing foreclosure. The law wasthe time.
supposed to provide these people a chance toNot only did the attorneys not have the power to
negotiate directly with their mortgage company atmake a deal for the mortgage company, they
a settlement conference. It was hoped that theonly had a phone number of a representative at
negotiations would result in a loan modificationthe mortgage company who had the power to
acceptable to each.do this on 13% of the cases. In many other
In October of 2009 the Center for New Yorkinstances the attorneys only had a general phone
City Neighborhoods (CNYCN) released a report ofnumber for the mortgage company. When they
a study it had done on the results of thecalled those numbers, they frequently remained
mediation program in New York City. CNYCN is anon hold for a long period of time. Some ended up
organization established in early 2008 with thebeing transferred to other people. Others were
express purpose of connecting people facingtold that the person with the authority to make a
foreclosure to free legal housing counseling anddecision was unavailable.
legal services. The housing counseling and legalMany times settlement conferences were delayed
services would help them save their homes.because the attorneys could not act. Only 2% of
The law establishing the Foreclosure Settlementthe time did the court request that someone
Conference program did not require that thecapable of making a decision for the mortgage
settlement conferences be tracked. It also did notcompany appear on the next scheduled date.
require that the results of these conferences beThe law did not make clear how the courts were
recorded.supposed to enforce the provisions of the law. No
In the research for their Report, CNYCN sentpenalties were specified if either a person facing
volunteer court observers to individual settlementforeclosure or a mortgage company violated any
conferences from June 2 to July 31, 2009. Theseprovisions. The law did not even provide for
observers reported on what happened during theadditional staffing for the courts to handle the
conferences. They also reported the decisionsadditional work created by the law.
reached. Employees of CNYCN then reviewed theAs a result the staffs of the courts in New York
findings of the court observers and compiled theirCity have been overwhelmed. There are very
report.few guidelines on how they are to implement the
From June 1 to July 31, 2009 there were 795law. They also have had minimal training in what
settlement conferences. Settlements were onlythey are supposed to do. They don't even know
reached at 21 of these conferences. That is awhat powers they have to enforce it.
mere 3% of the total. Closer analysis reveals thatVery rarely have the courts penalized mortgage
loans were modified at 6 conferences. Temporarycompanies for not complying with the law. In only
Forbearances were granted at 6 others. At 45% of the 795 cases did the courts figure out
there were no discernable outcomes. At thehow far apart the parties were. They requested
remaining 5 the mortgage companies agreed tothe mortgage companies to furnish payment
consider loan modification. However, there was nohistories on only 8% of the cases. Without having
follow up on these 5 to see if the loans werea payment history the person facing foreclosure
actually modified.and their representative had no way to make an
So there was only resolution at 12 of theinformed decision on the terms of any settlement.
conferences, the 6 with the loan modifications andA major concern pointed out in the CNYCN
the 6 with the temporary forbearances. That isreport was that under the provisions of the law
1.5% of the 795 conferences.the fees for the lawyers representing the
The Settlement Conference Program - A Totalmortgage companies had to be paid by the
Failurepeople facing foreclosure. They even had to pay
The 795 conferences took place in Brooklyn,these fees when the lawyers were not
Queens, the Bronx and Staten Island. With trueadequately prepared and did not have the power
settlements being reached in only 1.5% of theto negotiate in good faith.
conferences, the mandatory ForeclosureOn December 15, 2009 the governor of New
Settlement Conference Program in New YorkYork signed a bill extending the mandatory
City has been a total failure. One would have toForeclosure Settlement Conference Program to all
assume that if studies were done in other partspeople facing foreclosure. It is not clear if all of
of the state the findings would have been similar.the issues identified in the CNYCN report were
Why is the mandatory Foreclosure Settlementcorrected in that extension.
Conference Program failing? It is a mandatoryThere are no statistics on how many people
program. Was the design of the law faulty?facing foreclosure lost their homes because their
The purpose of this type of mediation is to givemortgage companies refused to negotiate in good
people facing foreclosure a chance to sit downfaith at the settlement conferences. For every
with a representative from their mortgageperson who did lose their home the cost was
company and work out a modification to theirtremendous not only to them and the investors in
existing loan. This modification may lower theirtheir loans but also to their neighbors and the
monthly payment and extend the duration ofother citizens of the state of New York. It is too
their loan. The people would be able to make theirlate to go back and correct this in any instance
new lower payment consistently. The foreclosurewhere it occurred. The state legislature should
process would stop. The people would save theircorrect the deficiencies in the law to prevent this
homes.from happening in the future.
The state legislature in New York assumed thatEvery other state and city which has foreclosure
avoiding foreclosure would be beneficial for allmediation in place should review their programs
parties. So the people facing foreclosure and theircarefully to make sure that they are operating as
mortgage companies would welcome theseintended and are helping people facing foreclosure
settlement conferences as a way to do this.save their homes. Appropriate corrections should
The findings of CNYCN were that this was notbe made to any that are not.