Yaz Lawyers Discuss Drug Defect And Fraud Lawsuits

Yaz lawyers are pharmaceutical product liabilityIn 2008 the FDA wrote to Bayer, again warning
attorneys and medical fraud lawyers who areof the misleading character of its television
currently investigating and filing claims against theadvertisements for Yaz and Yasmin to obscure
manufacturers Bertex/Bayer. The evidence tothe risks of the drug. According to the FDA "The
date suggests that the use of Yaz and Yasminoverall effect of the distracting visuals, graphics,
are associated with heart attack and stroke,concurrent supers and background music is to
other venous and arterial thrombotic andundermine the communication of the important
thromboembolic events, deep vein thrombosis,risk information, minimizing these risks and
DVT, thromboembolism, pulmonary embolism andmisleadingly suggesting that Yaz is safer than has
blood clots and well as hypertension, cardiacbeen demonstrated by substantial evidence or
arrhythmia, gallbladder disease and other sidesubstantial clinical experience." And the risks that
effects.the FDA considered were minimized by Bayer in
From the Yaz lawyers' perspective, the Yazits advertising, included venous and arterial
Yasmin lawsuits are relatively unique asthrombotic and thromboembolic events, such as
pharmaceutical product liability litigation because ofmyocardial infarction (heart attack),
the evidence of misrepresentation, fraud andthromboembolism and stroke, hepatic neoplasia,
over-promotion of the drugs on the part of thegallbladder disease and hypertension.
manufacturers, both misrepresenting the potentialOur Yaz drug fraud lawyers consider that there
benefits of the drugs and minimizing their risks.are substantial advantages to including fraud and
Some Yaz lawyers will approach the litigationmisrepresentation "causes of action" to the usual
solely as pharmaceutical product liability lawsuits;strict product liability and negligence claims
others, with experience in medical fraud litigationcommonly brought in drug product liability litigation.
will want to include causes of action also for fraudOne advantage is that there will be the potential
and misrepresentation, and will likely seek punitiveto obtain "punitive damages," in addition to the
damages for manufacturers. For a moreusual compensatory damages, to punish the drug
complete discussion you may consider "Yaz Drugcompany for its misrepresentations and to set an
Fraud, the Lawyer's Perspective" an article thatexample so that other drug companies will not
also considers objectively the options to pursueuse the same tactic of misrepresentation again.
Yaz litigation in the context of large MDL or classPunitive damages may indeed be deemed
action cases or as individual litigation.appropriate and justified. As the result of the
The evidence of the Bayer entitiesBayer entities misrepresentation of the benefits
over-promotion and misrepresentation of both theand risks of Yas and Yasmin in its television
benefits and risks of Yaz have yielded thecommercials it quickly obtained an advantage over
concurrence of the FDA, in letters to thethe other manufacturers of birth control pills. Our
manufacturer. In 2003 the FDA wrote to BertexYaz drug fraud lawyers consider that the success
Laboratories, then the manufacturer of Yasmin, aof Yaz and Yasmin indeed can be directly
company subsequently purchased by the Bayerattributable to its misrepresentations with regard
entities, stating: "The TV ad misleadinglyto the drugs purported benefits over other birth
overstates the efficacy and safety of Yasmin bycontrol pharmaceuticals. The Bayer entities have
suggesting that Yasmin is unique and thereforemade their huge profits in substantial part because
clinically superior to other birth control pills becauseof their advertising misrepresentations, and as our
it contains the chemically different progestinYaz drug fraud lawyers analyze it, punitive
drospirinon." Despite the FDA correspondence,damages would be justified to strip Bayer of its
Bertex and then Bayer continued to mislead theill-gained profit and to set the example for other
public in their advertising, both misrepresenting thedrug companies that they too must refrain from
drug as superior to other birth controlmisrepresentation as the means to gain the
pharmaceuticals and minimizing the risks.competitive advantage.